Consider the following claim: The sum of two rational numbers is a rational number. Here is an attempted proof of this claim:
- I. According to the definition of rational numbers, and are rational numbers.
- II. Expanding the form , using the rational number definition, we get .
- III. Since both and are integers, and is non-zero, according to the definition of rational numbers, is a rational number.
Which of the following best describes this proof?
AThe proof is completely correct, and the claim is true
BThe proof is completely correct, but there are counterexamples to the claim
CThe proof is wrong, and the first error occurs on line I
DThe proof is wrong, and the first error occurs on line II
EThe proof is wrong, and the first error occurs on line III